Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ctrl-shift - Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II"

ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu

Subject: Social discussion of CS in K-12

List archive

Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II"


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Reese, George Clifford" <reese AT illinois.edu>
  • To: Minsoo Park <parkmin AT u4sd.org>, Pattsi Petrie <pattsi2 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: "ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu" <ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II"
  • Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:57:05 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • List-archive: <http://lists.mste.illinois.edu/pipermail/ctrl-shift>
  • List-id: Social discussion of CS in K-12 <ctrl-shift.lists.mste.illinois.edu>

Meaningful is the key, I believe.

I think the history of the mathematics sequence we have comes from a time when math was a filter for the few, elite college-bound. A mathematics that is a pump for everyone is going to look different. I’m with Hacker, I think, in the belief that the Algebra II stuff is from an era of student filtration not inspiration. Here’s a table of contents from a book found on a google search: http://goo.gl/m7739

Which of these topics is used by a successful citizen on a reasonably frequent basis? Or take a look at this test: http://goo.gl/wRWyYd

I find it interesting, because I’m from the fixed-mindset, high school math teacher background. But normal humans would find it useless.

Question #10 makes a half-hearted attempt at relevance, but it feels pretty forced to me.


On the other hand, statistics is very relevant just for reading the paper or the blogs.

 

George

 

From: ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu [mailto:ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu] On Behalf Of Minsoo Park
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:56 AM
To: Pattsi Petrie
Cc: ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu
Subject: Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II"

 

I agree with Kathleen and P2. 

Content is a secondary issue. It's what's being dictated and overpowered by curriculums that drives instruction further away from providing opportunities to think logically, process it, and produce in a meaningful way.


Sent with MailTrack


Sincerely,

Minsoo Park

 

Enrichment teacher

Kenwood Elementary School

Email: parkmin@u4sd.org 

Phone: 217.351-3815

 

No problem can be solved from the same consciousness that created it.

- Einstein

 

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Pattsi Petrie <pattsi2 AT gmail.com> wrote:

Just a macro thought--is not the educational goal is to teach people how to think logically? If my assumption has merit, then that is a missing ingredient in Hacker's book. And I might be very tempted to argue that these courses in math are secondary to accomplish logic thinking compared to philosophy and logic.

And from where I presently sit in my community role, there is a massive lack of the ability to think and argue logically.

Just an aside--I used Hacker's boo, Two Nations: Black and White, in social planning class for years.

P2

 

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Charles Schultz <sacrophyte AT gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks for sharing that video, George - interesting comparison between Latin and Algebra. :)

 

How do we determine what people need? How do you balance that against what they want?

 

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Reese, George Clifford <reese AT illinois.edu> wrote:

This one is really making the rounds quickly. As did Hacker’s NYTimes editorial of a few years ago.

Peter Braunfeld, who I’m told is cited in Hacker’s book (I’m getting a copy), did a talk on Hacker’s editorial a couple years ago for us at MSTE.

https://goo.gl/oSA147

 

My own opinion is that a thoughtful reconsideration of the entire high school mathematics sequence is required.
Algebra, Statistics, and Computer Science/Discrete Mathematics makes much more sense for most students than the current sequence which is mostly a preparation for calculus that few people need to be productive, mathematically literate citizens.

 

George

 

From: ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu [mailto:ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Schultz
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:08 AM
To: ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu
Subject: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II"

 

Good morning,

 

I am hoping to solicit professional opinions from practioners, educators and researchers. Having climbed (and struggled) through 4 years of college math classes that I have never ever used at all, what are the pros and cons of replacing the theory-heavy math classes with something a bit more practical, with an eye towards training democratic (lower case 'd') citizens?

 

 

The author of the article, Dana Goldstein, is speaking mostly about Andrew Hacker's "The Math Myth", but also balances it out with a couple other opinions/theories as well. The ideas put forth by Ms. Goldstein resonated with my own experiences, so I am seeking other perspectives.

 

--

Charles Schultz



 

--

Charles Schultz

 

_______________________________________________
Ctrl-Shift mailing list
Ctrl-Shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu
https://lists.mste.illinois.edu/listinfo/ctrl-shift




--

Pattsi Petrie, PhD, FAICP
P2 Consulting
Champaign County Board, Chair , district 6,
Retired, Department of Urban and Regional Planning/DURP
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign/UIUC
<mailto:pattsi AT uiuc.edu>

College of Fellows, American Institute of Certified Planners

Professional Education and Outreach Programs
Past Chair APA Planning Women Division  


_______________________________________________
Ctrl-Shift mailing list
Ctrl-Shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu
https://lists.mste.illinois.edu/listinfo/ctrl-shift

 

Image removed by sender.

JPEG image




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page