ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu
Subject: Social discussion of CS in K-12
List archive
- From: "Reese, George Clifford" <reese AT illinois.edu>
- To: Minsoo Park <parkmin AT u4sd.org>, Pattsi Petrie <pattsi2 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: "ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu" <ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu>
- Subject: Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II"
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:57:05 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- List-archive: <http://lists.mste.illinois.edu/pipermail/ctrl-shift>
- List-id: Social discussion of CS in K-12 <ctrl-shift.lists.mste.illinois.edu>
Meaningful is the key, I believe. I think the history of the mathematics sequence we have comes from a time when math was a filter for the few, elite college-bound. A mathematics that is a pump for everyone is going to look different. I’m with Hacker, I think, in the belief that the Algebra II stuff is from an era of student filtration not inspiration. Here’s a table of contents from a book found on a google search: http://goo.gl/m7739 Which of these topics is used by a successful citizen on a reasonably frequent basis? Or take a look at this test: http://goo.gl/wRWyYd I find it interesting, because I’m from the fixed-mindset, high school math teacher background. But normal humans would find it useless. Question #10 makes a half-hearted attempt at relevance, but it feels pretty forced to me.
George
From: ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu [mailto:ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu]
On Behalf Of Minsoo Park
I agree with Kathleen and P2. Content is a secondary issue. It's what's being dictated and overpowered by curriculums that drives instruction further away from providing opportunities to think logically, process it, and produce in a meaningful
way. Sent with MailTrack
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Pattsi Petrie <pattsi2 AT gmail.com> wrote: Just a macro thought--is not the educational goal is to teach people how to think logically? If my assumption has merit, then that is a missing ingredient in Hacker's book. And I might be very tempted to argue that these courses in math are secondary to accomplish logic thinking compared to philosophy and logic. And from where I presently sit in my community role, there is a massive lack of the ability to think and argue logically. Just an aside--I used Hacker's boo, Two Nations: Black and White, in social planning class for years. P2
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Charles Schultz <sacrophyte AT gmail.com> wrote:
Pattsi Petrie,
PhD, FAICP College of Fellows, American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Education and Outreach Programs
|
- [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Charles Schultz, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Chuck Jackson, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Reese, George Clifford, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Smith, Kathleen Rapp, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Charles Schultz, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Pattsi Petrie, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Minsoo Park, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Reese, George Clifford, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Minsoo Park, 03/03/2016
- Re: [Ctrl-Shift] Looking for a professional opinion: "Down with Algebra II", Pattsi Petrie, 03/03/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.