Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ctrl-shift - [Ctrl-Shift] IT trends in schools: driving decisions with data

ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu

Subject: Social discussion of CS in K-12

List archive

[Ctrl-Shift] IT trends in schools: driving decisions with data


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Charles Schultz <sacrophyte AT gmail.com>
  • To: "ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu" <ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu>
  • Subject: [Ctrl-Shift] IT trends in schools: driving decisions with data
  • Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:17:46 -0500
  • List-archive: <http://lists.mste.illinois.edu/pipermail/ctrl-shift>
  • List-id: Social discussion of CS in K-12 <ctrl-shift.lists.mste.illinois.edu>

Yo, Shifters!


At Monday's school board meeting, there is an item to request approval for a piece of software that acts as a tool to consolidate and analyze information and help administrators make decisions. Among the many buzz-words, we call this "data driven decisions" and "business intelligence". I cannot deep-link the agenda item (right, David?), so I will copy portions here.

Before I paste, here are my questions:
  1. Do we have too much data in the first place? Apparently we have more than we can handle presently
  2. "School" is becoming more and more like a business; is this a bad thing?
  3. Crikey, $50,000/year for upkeep and maintenance!?!? Is this the best we can do?
I am not a teacher, but I do have a career in Information Technology; I understand the jargon, I see the trends. But what is truly best for our students? I firmly believe that what is best for our students is also best for our society.



Here is the excerpt from the school board agenda:

Right now our over-taxed data team works very hard to get data reports as quickly as possible that help us make instructional and environmental decisions.  Data comes from a variety of sources and often times we spend an extraordinary amount of time getting the right data collected into one file and then even more time creating a chart or table that displays the data in a useful way. This is not sustainable to keep up with the changing needs of 19 campuses and a growing number of programs and activities that require data analysis.  We need our data to start working for us.  We need a better, faster, more robust, instantly customizable, constantly updated data repository that gives us reports and analysis so we can make timely decisions for our students’ academic and social well-being.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

The software (including set up/training) costs $252,000.  The annual fee of $50,000 covers ongoing upkeep and necessary changes.   


Data Driven Graduation White Paper (2).pdf (552 KB)

DecEd_Decatur CS (2).pdf (205 KB)

VoicesfromDistrict (2).pdf (193 KB)





--
Charles Schultz



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page