Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ctrl-shift - Re: [Ctrl-Shift] But for...

ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu

Subject: Social discussion of CS in K-12

List archive

Re: [Ctrl-Shift] But for...


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Reese, George Clifford" <reese AT illinois.edu>
  • To: "ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu" <ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [Ctrl-Shift] But for...
  • Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:05:22 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • List-archive: <http://lists.mste.illinois.edu/pipermail/ctrl-shift>
  • List-id: Social discussion of CS in K-12 <ctrl-shift.lists.mste.illinois.edu>

Hi Martin,
This has taken me a couple weeks to get to this, perhaps because I knew it
would take a while. And in the end, I could only get started, not finished.
Not sure what finished would mean. -George


"But for the ....leadership.... contributions of... Judy Wiegand and Unit
4,.... our collaborative projects would have struggled to...get off the
ground in working in the schools with computational thinking."

"But for the ....research.... contributions of... Maya, Quinn, Travis, Saad
and others,.... our collaborative projects would have struggled to...document
through careful collection of data the important changes taking place at our
partner school."

"But for the ....teacher-oriented leadership of.... contributions of... Todd
Lash, Jessica Pitcher, and Minsoo Park,.... our collaborative projects would
have struggled to...happen AT ALL. Teachers who pick up the ball and run,
always in the face of huge obstacles in time and resources, are an
inspiration."

"But for the ....inspirational.... contributions of... those young students
at Kenwood.... our collaborative projects would have struggled to...feel the
validation of student success that you can see as you watch them work
together and learn."

"But for the ....relentless transparency.... contributions of...,Charles
Schultz,.... our collaborative projects would have struggled to...be
thoughtful of the implications in each of the steps in our collaboration,
remembering that there are constituencies beyond those who come to meetings."

"But for the ....entrepreneurial-minded.... contributions of... Mike Royse,
Kerris Lee, Dan Ditchfield, and others,.... our collaborative projects would
have struggled to...have the gumption to jump in and do it."

"But for the ....creative.... contributions of... Katrina Kennett and ....
our collaborative projects would have struggled to...incorporate new
democratically-oriented ideas like EdCamp that provide a shot of energy and
broaden our discussion."

It feels to me that I could go on and on in this vein. ...

But I don't want to forget us at MSTE.
"But for ... George and Michael's... contribution, our collaborative projects
would have struggled to...meet regularly to talk and share and drink beer and
coffee and celebrate." ;)

As you note, we typically do this with citations. It's interesting to think
of this in the context of traditional academic writing. One is inclined to
say things like the following:
Our collaboration was inspired by early strategic leadership (Wiegand et al.,
Royse et al.,) and the receptivity and engagement of teachers (Lash et al.)
and most of all their students' energy (See Kenwood K-5 students'
presentations). Thankfully we have documented some of this through systematic
research efforts (Israel, et al., 2015) as well as regular meetings and a
growing intellectual eco-system around school transformation and educational
innovation.


George Reese
Office for Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education (MSTE)
505 East Green St.
Suite 102
Champaign, IL 61820
217-333-6604


-----Original Message-----
From:
ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu

[mailto:ctrl-shift-bounces AT lists.mste.illinois.edu]
On Behalf Of Martin Wolske
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 12:07 PM
To:
ctrl-shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu
Subject: [Ctrl-Shift] But for...

Hi all,

As we prepare for the public engagement symposium, and as we work on various
writing projects, but also to further help us in our own reflections on our
wonderful work together, I'd like to propose a possible group exercise. This
was something suggested last fall at a session of the Engagement Scholarship
Consortium in relation to doing evaluation that works to move beyond
privileging the contributions and perspective of just one entity. For this
university group, in talking with funders, directors, the university more
broadly, they first highlighted the great successes of the project overall.
Then they described their contributions and concluded by saying "But for our
contribution, this project would not have been able to..." while also
highlighting in reports and presentations the other contributors and stating
"But for the contribution of this partner and that partner, this project
would not have been able to..." We already are expected to do this by
highlighting the academic literature that informed our work.
This group is working to extend that to equally privilege community and
university partners contributions.

I would be extremely curious to hear from each person on this list
reflections, sent as a series of emails or as one attached reflection
document, on the questions:
"But for your own contribution, our collaborative projects would have
struggled to..."
"But for the ________ contributions of ________, our collaborative projects
would have struggled to..." (where the first blank is the ways in which
contributions were made and the second blank is who specifically made those
contributions)

For the second, this might include past teachers or mentors, books and
articles you've read, etc. as well as a person or organization active in our
work today. Who do you see stepping up to the plate to make a contribution,
and how? Who contributed in important ways in the past to influence your
ideas, attitudes, behavior, etc. that are now having an influence on our work
today?

I suspect the story isn't just or perhaps even primarily the digital
technologies and coding that's happening, but the organic community, both
adult and child/teen peer, that has been developing, and it would be
fascinating to get a better sense of the layers of connections that comprise
the community. Perhaps this exercise would help begin bringing that to
light???

-- Martin

--
Martin Wolske, Senior Research Scientist and Adjunct Faculty Graduate School
of Library & Information Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
337 LIS Building, 501 East Daniel Street Champaign, IL 61820

217-244-8094 (office) 217-244-3302 (fax) 217-840-7434 (cell) Google Hangout:
martin.wolske; Twitter: @MartinBWolske; Blog: http://mwolske.wordpress.com


_______________________________________________
Ctrl-Shift mailing list
Ctrl-Shift AT lists.mste.illinois.edu
https://lists.mste.illinois.edu/listinfo/ctrl-shift





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page